If the description of experience is called phenomenology, then the science of time will have to be called chronology, not matter how different the meaning of this word is from its ordinary usage. It will not merely be a list of different forms of time, and it will have to be written 'seven and seventy times over' beyond what can be given in a single treatise.
Kant's categories are far too impoverished to exhaust the self-reflective development of time. Heidegger's way of thinking, which Dreyfus has clearly called "formal indication," always thinks time by starting from a phenomenon other than time itself. Derrida here follows suit. Although their contributions to this subject ought not to be underestimated, a simple act of following their styles will not yield a logos of time, chronology.
Hegel's Logic is an extensive chronicle of time developing temporarily and temporally. This work deserves to be incorporated verbatum into the present project. Schelling is the one who will spark the first thoughts here. He will then be in the background without being explicitly referenced.
